- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 11:48:24 -0500
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
* Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> [2012-02-03 10:07+0000] > > On 3 Feb 2012, at 06:07, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > Hearing no objection, I implemented Richard's proposed adoption of the IRI-safe function per http://www.w3.org/mid/20120201003753.GA8387@w3.org . > > You still got the “(a subset of HTML5 form dataset encoding)” bit in there, which strictly speaking I think isn't correct. (We can go to CR with that text in place IMO as it's really minor issue.) Otherwise the change looks good. fixed in 1.26 tx > > I also added a normative ref to R2RML and adopted much of Richard's SOTD text. (I have never seen <h4/>s in an SOTD, but I think it makes it a lot more readable). > > The OWL2 specs do that and I sort of liked it. It certainly helped me to make sense of the SotD boilerplate :-) seriously. otherwise you have to wade through to find the bits you might care about > Richard > > > > > > > > >> Eric? > >> All the best, Ashok > >> > >> On 2/2/2012 11:05 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > >>> Ashok, > >>> > >>> We said that I should ping you when the R2RML Editor's Draft is ready to be converted into a CR draft. I consider it ready now. The ED is as always in CVS in the /r2rml/ folder, and The life version is at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/ > >>> > >>> It still calls itself an Editor's Draft, and has the CVS revision history on the end (with a corresponding item in the ToC); I assume that the chairs/team take care of this in their own copy. > >>> > >>> All the best, > >>> Richard > >> > > > > -- > > -ericP > > > -- -ericP
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 16:49:03 UTC