> Hearing no objection, I implemented Richard's proposed adoption of the IRI-safe function per http://www.w3.org/mid/20120201003753.GA8387@w3.org . > I also added a normative ref to R2RML and adopted much of Richard's SOTD text. (I have never seen <h4/>s in an SOTD, but I think it makes it a lot more readable). That's relieving to learn, thanks. Where? Michael Sent from my iPad On 3 Feb 2012, at 06:07, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org> wrote: > * ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> [2012-02-02 17:46-0800] >> Great! What about DM? > > Hearing no objection, I implemented Richard's proposed adoption of the IRI-safe function per http://www.w3.org/mid/20120201003753.GA8387@w3.org . > I also added a normative ref to R2RML and adopted much of Richard's SOTD text. (I have never seen <h4/>s in an SOTD, but I think it makes it a lot more readable). > > >> Eric? >> All the best, Ashok >> >> On 2/2/2012 11:05 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: >>> Ashok, >>> >>> We said that I should ping you when the R2RML Editor's Draft is ready to be converted into a CR draft. I consider it ready now. The ED is as always in CVS in the /r2rml/ folder, and The life version is at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/ >>> >>> It still calls itself an Editor's Draft, and has the CVS revision history on the end (with a corresponding item in the ToC); I assume that the chairs/team take care of this in their own copy. >>> >>> All the best, >>> Richard >> > > -- > -ericP
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 06:47:17 UTC