- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:41:04 +0100
- To: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
- Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 10 May 2011, at 21:32, David McNeil wrote:
> If you're violently opposed to lists, then how about the last option I mentioned:
>
> [] rr:parentTriplesMap <#TriplesMap1>;
> rr:join "col1,col1", "col2,col2";
>
> This keeps the columns that are being checked *very* close to each other ;-)
>
> Indeed. I didn't notice the first time I read this that you put the two col1's together in this notation. So the first value always refers to the child table? Seems a bit too obscure for my taste.
Fair enough -- it's not very explicit.
Let me do one more try:
[] rr:parentTriplesMap <#TriplesMap1>;
rr:joinChildParent "col1=>col1", "col2=>col2";
Or maybe
rr:joinFromTo "col1=>col1", "col2=>col2";
Any better?
Richard
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 21:41:33 UTC