Re: Proposal for ISSUE-32, curly braces in joinCondition

On 10 May 2011, at 21:32, David McNeil wrote:
> If you're violently opposed to lists, then how about the last option I mentioned:
>  [] rr:parentTriplesMap <#TriplesMap1>;
>     rr:join "col1,col1", "col2,col2";
> This keeps the columns that are being checked *very* close to each other ;-)
> Indeed. I didn't notice the first time I read this that you put the two col1's together in this notation. So the first value always refers to the child table? Seems a bit too obscure for my taste.

Fair enough -- it's not very explicit.

Let me do one more try:

 [] rr:parentTriplesMap <#TriplesMap1>;
    rr:joinChildParent "col1=>col1", "col2=>col2";

Or maybe

    rr:joinFromTo "col1=>col1", "col2=>col2";

Any better?


Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 21:41:33 UTC