Re: Proposal for ISSUE-32, curly braces in joinCondition

> If you're violently opposed to lists, then how about the last option I
> mentioned:
>
>  [] rr:parentTriplesMap <#TriplesMap1>;
>     rr:join "col1,col1", "col2,col2";
>
> This keeps the columns that are being checked *very* close to each other
> ;-)
>
>
Indeed. I didn't notice the first time I read this that you put the two
col1's together in this notation. So the first value always refers to the
child table? Seems a bit too obscure for my taste.

-David