Re: My mistake in the ISSUE-42 resolution (was: Re: a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping)

Sure, a no-brainer and embarrassing enough no one noticed it during the call, but I guess we were all very busy with the issue itself. Will report on this during next week's telecon - consider it fixed.

Cheers,
            Michael

On 18 Jun 2011, at 20:49, "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:

> On 17 Jun 2011, at 15:51, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>>>> RESOLUTION: Re ISSUE-42, the WG decides add to the Direct Mapping spec the generating of rdfs:range (and possibly other) schema triples and also add a note to the Direct Mapping spec saying: "The DM does not generate triples for NULL values. For a detailed discussion of this issue, see the following document" which points to a separate working group note
>> 
>> I suspect that the proposal was intended to mention rdfs:domain instead of rdfs:range, per <http://www.w3.org/mid/E454FC26-9115-4886-AD45-698A5C09C1E8@cyganiak.de>.
> 
> Oh well! You are completely right, I got confused when I phrased that proposal during the call. I meant to say rdfs:domain and not rdfs:range ...
> 
> I wish someone had spotted this during the call :-(
> 
> @Chairs, can we just “fix” the resolution to say domain instead of range?
> 
> Richard

Received on Saturday, 18 June 2011 20:00:38 UTC