- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:49:59 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 17 Jun 2011, at 15:51, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: >>> RESOLUTION: Re ISSUE-42, the WG decides add to the Direct Mapping spec the generating of rdfs:range (and possibly other) schema triples and also add a note to the Direct Mapping spec saying: "The DM does not generate triples for NULL values. For a detailed discussion of this issue, see the following document" which points to a separate working group note > > I suspect that the proposal was intended to mention rdfs:domain instead of rdfs:range, per <http://www.w3.org/mid/E454FC26-9115-4886-AD45-698A5C09C1E8@cyganiak.de>. Oh well! You are completely right, I got confused when I phrased that proposal during the call. I meant to say rdfs:domain and not rdfs:range ... I wish someone had spotted this during the call :-( @Chairs, can we just “fix” the resolution to say domain instead of range? Richard
Received on Saturday, 18 June 2011 19:50:31 UTC