[Bug 4378] error in K2-NodeTest-21


--- Comment #25 from Josh Spiegel <josh.spiegel@oracle.com> ---
I agree with Tim that using the function body context item should be a static

Mike, I don't understand why allowing a static error in this case would be a
"fairly disruptive change".  For example, you said "Saxon in effect rewrites
"." within a function body as fn:error("XPDY0002")".  It isn't clear to me why
you can't simply raise a static error at this point instead.  

But yes, whether it is a static error or a type error that can be raised
statically, implementations should not be forced to make any incompatible

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 5 October 2015 11:40:45 UTC