- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 10:55:50 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4378 --- Comment #24 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> --- If only because XPDY0002 doesn't have "TY" in it, I'd rather just leave XPDY0002 as is and permit XPTY0004. This should not be seen as a backwards compatibility issue, because it's (a) not a new error code, and (b) is perfectly reasonable given the static typing rules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 October 2015 10:55:54 UTC