- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:38:25 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29088 Bug ID: 29088 Summary: [xslt 3.0] visibility="abstract" on xsl:expose Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Last Call drafts Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSLT 3.0 Assignee: mike@saxonica.com Reporter: mike@saxonica.com QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Target Milestone: --- It's an error to specify visibility="abstract" on a template, function, variable, or attribute set unless the body of the component is empty. There's no similar rule when a component is declared as abstract on xsl:expose. Should there be? Or should the body just be ignored? (It's not so much an issue with xsl:accept because you can only accept something as abstract if it is already abstract in the used package.) A slightly orthogonal point: for xsl:template we say If the visibility attribute is present with the value abstract then (a) the sequence constructor defining the template body must be empty: that is, the only permitted children are xsl:context-item and xsl:param, and (b) there must be no match attribute. I wonder if (b) is too strict: should it say: "(b) there must be a name attribute". Visibility is only relevant to named templates, but if we allow the template to have both a name and a match pattern, I don't see why we shouldn't allow the visibility attribute to define its visibility when used as a named template, rather than requiring the visibility to be specified in a separate xsl:expose declaration. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2015 08:38:29 UTC