- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 14:57:44 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28129 --- Comment #3 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- Additional (editorial) note on section 18.2.2, we say that @use-accumulator has no effect when streaming is not specified, but we do not say whether or not it is parsed. In other words, is use-accumulator="no-existing-accum" always an error, or only when streaming is specified and the accumulator indeed does not exist in scope? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 5 April 2015 14:57:46 UTC