- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 07:10:46 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25174 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I wonder if this can't be done simply by defining an error code that is guaranteed to be used exclusively for errors encountered at the start of the streaming operation, and then catching this specific error with a conventional try/catch instruction around the xsl:stream? I.e. no new syntax, just new semantics for a specific error code? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 16 May 2014 07:10:47 UTC