- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 14:36:15 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26388
Bug ID: 26388
Summary: [XSLT30] Normative reference of XML Schema 1.1 and
general references clean-up
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSLT 3.0
Assignee: mike@saxonica.com
Reporter: abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl
QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
I noticed some inconsistencies and/or out-of-date issues with specs. I am not
sure whether this was noted elsewhere already, if so, please consider this
bug-report simply as a way to track its status.
I used the latest internal working draft (member only) for reviewing the
references and other sections.
The text of section 4.1 XML Versions says the following:
"The current version of [XML Schema Part 2] (that is, XSD 1.0) does not
reference the XML 1.1 specifications. This means that datatypes such as
xs:NCName and xs:ID are constrained by the XML 1.0 rules, and do not allow the
full range of values permitted by XML 1.1. This situation will not be resolved
until a new version of [XML Schema Part 2] becomes available; in the meantime,
it is recommended that implementers wishing to support XML 1.1 should consult
[XML Schema 1.0 and XML 1.1] for guidance. An XSLT 3.0 processor that supports
XML 1.1 should implement the rules in later versions of [XML Schema Part 2] as
they become available."
XML Schema 1.1 is now a Recommendation and I think this section needs cleaning
up, because XSD 1.1 does reference XML 1.1 normatively.
Under A.1 Normative References there are a few references that I think need
updating:
> Data Model
> XQuery and XPath Data Model (XDM) 3.0, Norman Walsh, John Snelson, Editors.
> World Wide Web Consortium, 22 October 2013. This version is
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-xpath-datamodel-30-20131022/. The latest version
> is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel-30/.
XDM 3.0 is now a Recommendation, there is no need anymore to link to the PR
edition.
> Functions and Operators
> XQuery and XPath Functions and Operators 3.0, Michael Kay, Editor. World
> Wide Web Consortium, 22 October 2013. This version is
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-xpath-functions-30-20131022/. The latest version
> is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions-30/.
F&O 3.0 is now a recommendation, there is no need anymore to link to the PR
edition.
> ISO 15924
> ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Information and
> documentation — Codes for the representation of names of scripts ISO
> 15924:2004, January 2004.
This reference does not have a normative link. The next reference normatively
links to the Codes Register. A candidate for a normative link might be the
original document on ISO.org:
https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:15924:ed-1:v1:en.
> XSLT and XQuery Serialization
> XSLT and XQuery Serialization 3.0, Henry Zongaro, Editor. World Wide Web
> Consortium, 22 October 2013. This version is
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-xslt-xquery-serialization-30-20131022/. The
> latest version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-xquery-serialization-30/.
Serialization 3.0 is now a Recommendation, there is no need anymore to link to
the PR edition.
> XML Schema
> World Wide Web Consortium. XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 1:
> Structures. W3C Working Draft 3 December 2009. See
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/
XML Schema 1.1 (perhaps the title should reflect the version?) is now a
Recommendation, the text "W3C Working Draft 3 December 2009" is outdated. The
link is still correct, but there is no "this version" reference. It should
probably be "http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-xmlschema11-1-20120405/" for "this
version".
> XPath 3.0
> XML Path Language (XPath) 3.0, Jonathan Robie, Don Chamberlin, Michael Dyck,
> John Snelson, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 22 October 2013. This
> version is http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-xpath-30-20131022/. The latest
> version is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-30/.
XPath 3.0 is now a Recommendation, there is no need anymore to link to the PR
edition.
A.2 Other references
> XLink
> XML Linking Language (XLink) Version 1.0, Steven DeRose, David Orchard, and
> Eve Maler, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 27 Jun 2001. This version is
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xlink-20010627/. The latest version is
> available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink/.
There is now a new version of XLink, XLink 1.1, available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink11/ (a Rec since 2010). Not sure we need to link to
the 1.1 version, I am not acquainted with the changes.
> XML Schema 1.0 and XML 1.1
> World Wide Web Consortium. Processing XML 1.1 documents with XML Schema 1.0
> processors. W3C Working Group Note 11 May 2005. See
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/NOTE-xml11schema10-20050511/
Perhaps with the advent of XML Schema 1.1, we can (normatively?) require that
XML 1.1 processors use XML Schema 1.1? Not sure of the implications though.
> XSLFO
Does it make sense to (also) link to XSL-FO 2.0 at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20/? It is in Draft and I've heard that it may stay
in Draft for the foreseeable future by lack of members.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 19 July 2014 14:36:16 UTC