- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:23:17 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24726 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> --- Hi Mike, I must be exhausted, I don't know why I said 'arrays' when I meant 'maps'. Here is the corrected text. ---------------------- XPath can now create empty maps or create maps from literals, two of the uses of map:new(). The third use is to merge maps - for this purpose it would be helpful to have a more meaningful name. Consider the following two expressions, which differ only by the name of the function: $map => map:new( { "counter" : $map($key) + 1 } ) $map => map:merge( { "counter" : $map($key) + 1 } ) To my eyes, the meaning is much more obvious with the name map:merge(). I suggest: 1. Either keep the zero-arity and 1-arity map:new() as is or drop them in favor of the new constructors. 2. Create a new function called map:merge() with the same semantics as the current map:new() with arity greater than 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 17:23:18 UTC