- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:45:36 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24689 --- Comment #2 from Innovimax <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Michael Kay from comment #1) > The WG reviewed this and agreed in principle that references should be > updated. > > Hoving checked the detail, I believe the following references should not be > updated before 3.0 publication: > > (a) charmod, because this is non-normative, and we refer to a policy on > normalization that has changed over subsequent revisions of the document, > and the reference would be meaningless if updated. OK. Is it possible to add a note in the reference for that purpose ? > > (b) ISO 8601, because we refer to specific sections of the ISO document, and > I do not have access to the 2004 draft to check that these references are > still valid. Here is one for ISO 8601-2004 http://dotat.at/tmp/ISO_8601-2004_E.pdf I think that we should escalled it to W3C Team to ask ISO to give official accesss to spec that are related to our work > > The other references have been updated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 16:45:37 UTC