- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:42:56 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24549 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> --- We discussed this in Prague. In reviewing the section to get a sense of the context, we noticed a couple of points not directly relevant to this bug report: - The note in the first bullet item of 2.3.2 is not quite right; it has now been arranged that no two packages can declare stylesheet parameters with the same name. (Or so we now believe.) - Paragraph 2 in bullet item 2 is not quite wrong, but feels misleading: the context item for the initialization of global variables and parameters is not the initial context item but its root. The "use" of the initial context item for initialization of global variables is thus rather indirect. On the point initially raised here: the reference to 'all' functions is too broad, as the point does not apply to unstable functions. Possible fix: for "all functions" read "deterministic functions". Or "... creates an execution scope. As defined elsewhere, this has as a consequence that deterministic functions called within that execution scope with the same arguments will return the same results.") When we followed the link to F and O, we discovered that it does not explicitly connect identity of execution scope to the expectation that deterministic functions will return identical results for identical arguments (need to insert "within a given execution scope" before "repeated calls with the same explicit and implicit arguments must return identical results"?). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 09:42:57 UTC