- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:07:41 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4273
--- Comment #41 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2009-02-13 19:07:41 ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> in my implementation and customer experiences, I found supporting
> optimistic static typing is more useful.
Okay, but that doesn't really help resolve this issue.
(1) Even with optimistic static typing, the typing rules still need to be
correct, which they aren't currently.
(2) I'm not going to introduce optimistic static typing as an erratum to
FS 1.0.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 19:07:51 UTC