- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:56:15 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5332 --- Comment #12 from zhen hua liu <zhen.liu@oracle.com> 2009-02-06 22:56:15 --- for your comment #11, I understand if we disallow function to be vacuous, it simplifies the matter. However, is not that inconsistent with the vacuous expression definition which states that it is a simple expression that returns only empty sequence or raises errors. Imagine, for code modularity, people may wish to develop one generic error function that raises errors and then make all their code to call that common generic error function. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 6 February 2009 22:56:26 UTC