- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:17:55 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6513 Summary: [XQuery] inconsistent terminology in definition of derives-from() Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Recommendation Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: XQuery AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@redhat.com ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org XQuery 2.5.4 [SequenceType Matching] defines the concepts of "known" and "unknown" schema types: The given schema type may be "known" (defined in the in-scope schema definitions), or "unknown" (not defined in the in-scope schema definitions). The definition of pseudo-function 'derives-from' then uses these terms, but it also uses the phrases "a schema type [not] found in the in-scope schema definitions" suggesting that this is a distinct concept from known/unknown, which I don't believe is intended. Therefore, please change "AT is a schema type found in the in-scope schema definitions" to "AT is a known type" and "AT is a schema type not found in the in-scope schema definitions" to "AT is an unknown type" (Alternatively, you could unfold all uses of "known" and "unknown", and get rid of the definitions, but they seem like useful abbreviations.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2009 22:18:03 UTC