- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:33:04 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6809 --- Comment #5 from Christian Gruen <christian.gruen@gmail.com> 2009-04-16 18:33:04 --- Hi Pat, you are welcome. I checked the queries once more. Before closing this bug, it would be great if you could have another look at the following issues: [3] ft-3.4.3-examples-q3.xq It's good to hear your opinion on this query, as I surely had quite an implementation-centered approach in my mind here. As I feel that this issue is more complicated as I thought first, I'll add an extra "bug" to discuss the relationship between Thesaurus and match options. Considering the relationship between "Merrygould" and "Marigold", I would indeed expect the "soundex.xml" file to be modified. This was my suggestion.. OLD: <term>Marigold</term> <synonym> <term>Merrygould</term> <relationship>sounds like</relationship> </synonym> NEW: <term>Merrygould</term> <synonym> <term>Marigold</term> <relationship>sounds like</relationship> </synonym> If I process a thesaurus request, I look up the input word (Merrygould) and return all words that are linked with the "sounds like" relationship to this term. I have no access to the complete ISO 2788 standard, but, as far as I know, the "sounds like" relationship is not defined there. So an XQuery implementation has to "guess" how a "unknown" relationship like this one works. I treat all undefined relationships as unidirectional, i.e. I will currently return "Merrygould" for the input term "Marigold" - but not the other way round. If the xml file will be modified as proposed above, the relationship can be consistently answered like the other thesaurus examples. If you have a different opinion or think I'm wrong, don't hesitate to tell me. [5] ft-3.4.3-expressions-q3 Now, result should be defined as "Fragment" in XQFTCatalog.xml.. [9] thesaurus-queries-results-q5 / q5b / q6 / q6b Different spellings: "misspelling-of" vs "misspelling of".. Christian -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2009 18:33:14 UTC