[Bug 5652] Constuctors for union types

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5652


nick@cbcl.co.uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Comment #2 from nick@cbcl.co.uk  2008-04-22 14:07 -------
OK. That makes sense.

(We were getting confused as were reading "For every atomic type" as "Any type
which is a subtype of xs:anyAtomicType", which the union types are, but clearly
isn't what is actually being described in 5.4)

Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 14:08:04 UTC