- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:41:20 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5652 ------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com 2008-04-22 13:41 ------- (Personal response) Section 5.4 starts: "For every atomic type in the static context that is derived from a primitive type, there is a constructor function..." A union type is not an atomic type; I think it is quite clear that constructor functions are not defined for list and union types. It would be nice if they were, but currently they are not.
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 13:41:53 UTC