- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:40:30 -0400
- To: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>, Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Back on March 5, you asked some difficult questions in response to my
earlier questions about an xpath op namespace [1]. Since I didn't have
good answers to your questions, I asked someone else from RIF to help,
and Jos de Bruijn kindly did, on March 28 [2]. I understand things get
busy, but we expect to proceed to Last Call with this in a matter of
weeks. At this point, I expect we'll proceed using
"http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-operators" as a namespace for the xpath
operators. Your alternative design approaches, while probably viable,
do not appear to meet our needs as well as simply picking a namespace
name.
-- Sandro
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2008Mar/0021.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2008Mar/0090.html
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 15:42:06 UTC