- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:09:14 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4719
Summary: [FT] editorial: 3.7 Ignore Option
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Last Call drafts
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: Full Text
AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org
ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
3.7 Ignore Option
[1]
position of section
Given that an FTIgnoreOption can only occur as part of an
FTContainsExpr, I think this section should be close to 2.2.
[2]
para 1
"The ignore option specifies a set of nodes whose content are ignored"
s/content/contents/
[3]
"(see FTContainsExp)"
s/Exp/Expr/
[4]
"Let N1, N2, ..., Nk be the sequence of nodes of the search context."
If the search context contains atomic values, this would seem to
exclude them from the new search context.
[5]
para 2
"Now, let I1, I2, ..., In be the sequence of items that UnionExpr
evaluates to. For each Ni (i=1..k) a copy is made..."
To get the quantification right, change to:
For each Ni (i=1...k), let I1, I2, ..., In be the sequence of
items that UnionExpr evaluates to. A copy of Ni is made...
It might be even better if you pulled in the stuff about evaluating
UnionExpr from the preceding para.
[6]
"that is not Ni"
So "without content ." has no effect?
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 10:09:16 UTC