- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:09:14 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4719 Summary: [FT] editorial: 3.7 Ignore Option Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Last Call drafts Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Full Text AssignedTo: jim.melton@acm.org ReportedBy: jmdyck@ibiblio.org QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org 3.7 Ignore Option [1] position of section Given that an FTIgnoreOption can only occur as part of an FTContainsExpr, I think this section should be close to 2.2. [2] para 1 "The ignore option specifies a set of nodes whose content are ignored" s/content/contents/ [3] "(see FTContainsExp)" s/Exp/Expr/ [4] "Let N1, N2, ..., Nk be the sequence of nodes of the search context." If the search context contains atomic values, this would seem to exclude them from the new search context. [5] para 2 "Now, let I1, I2, ..., In be the sequence of items that UnionExpr evaluates to. For each Ni (i=1..k) a copy is made..." To get the quantification right, change to: For each Ni (i=1...k), let I1, I2, ..., In be the sequence of items that UnionExpr evaluates to. A copy of Ni is made... It might be even better if you pulled in the stuff about evaluating UnionExpr from the preceding para. [6] "that is not Ni" So "without content ." has no effect?
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 10:09:16 UTC