- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:33:18 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3312 Summary: XPST0080, XPST0003 and XPST0051 overlaps Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Candidate Recommendation Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XQuery AssignedTo: chamberl@almaden.ibm.com ReportedBy: frans.englich@telia.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org XPST0080 reads as follows: 'The target type must be an atomic type that is in the in-scope schema types and is not xs:NOTATION or xdt:anyAtomicType, optionally followed by the occurrence indicator "?" to denote that an empty sequence is permitted [err:XPST0080]' XPST0051: "If a QName that is used as an AtomicType is not defined as an atomic type in the in-scope schema types, a static error is raised [err:XPST0051]." XPST0051 and XPST0080 overlaps when a non-atomic type is referred to in a cast/castable as expression. Examples: $input cast as xs:anyType or $input cast as xs:doesNotExist That XPST0080 also discusses the absence(or presence) of '?', making it overlap with XPST0003. I don't think it has to mention '?' because the grammar clearly specifies it, as for all other expressions. I think it would reduce potential overlaps by not discussing '?' in the definition of XPST0080. I suggest to reduce the scope of XPST0080. Proposed wording: In the first paragraph, replace: "The target type must be an atomic type that is in the in-scope schema types and is not xs:NOTATION or xs:anyAtomicType, optionally followed by the occurrence indicator "?" to denote that an empty sequence is permitted [err:XPST0080]." with: "The target type must be an atomic type that is in the in-scope schema types[XPST0051]. In addition, the target type cannot be xs:NOTATION or xs:anyAtomicType[XPST0080]. The optional occurrence indicator "?" denotes that an empty sequence is permitted." Frans
Received on Monday, 5 June 2006 14:33:30 UTC