- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:21:21 +0100
- To: "Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
* Michael Kay wrote: >In my view the language of the spec is correct. X is optional and Y is >optional, therefore both X and Y are optional. If anyone is in any doubt >about the meaning, the formal grammar makes it clear (as does the remainder >of the sentence). Regardless of whether it's correct, it's awkward and superfluous. As the Process document notes, W3C strives for a high level of editorial quality in addition to plain formal correctness. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Saturday, 14 January 2006 15:20:43 UTC