Re: XSLT20: matching-substring and non-matching-substring vs "optional"

* Michael Kay wrote:
>In my view the language of the spec is correct. X is optional and Y is
>optional, therefore both X and Y are optional. If anyone is in any doubt
>about the meaning, the formal grammar makes it clear (as does the remainder
>of the sentence).

Regardless of whether it's correct, it's awkward and superfluous. As
the Process document notes, W3C strives for a high level of editorial
quality in addition to plain formal correctness.
Björn Höhrmann · ·
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 ·
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · 

Received on Saturday, 14 January 2006 15:20:43 UTC