- From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:13:34 -0000
- To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
In my view the language of the spec is correct. X is optional and Y is optional, therefore both X and Y are optional. If anyone is in any doubt about the meaning, the formal grammar makes it clear (as does the remainder of the sentence). Michael Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > Bjoern Hoehrmann > Sent: 14 January 2006 14:57 > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: XSLT20: matching-substring and > non-matching-substring vs "optional" > > > Dear XSL Working Group, > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/CR-xslt20-20051103/ has "... may have two > child elements: xsl:matching-substring and xsl:non-matching-substring. > Both elements are optional, and neither may appear more than once. At > least one of them must be present." Please strike "Both elements are > optional" since one of them is not optional. > > regards, > -- > Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · > http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · > http://www.bjoernsworld.de > 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · > http://www.websitedev.de/ > >
Received on Saturday, 14 January 2006 15:13:51 UTC