- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:10:28 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2729
mike@saxonica.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From mike@saxonica.com 2006-02-02 17:10 -------
We debated the issue yesterday and decided (reluctantly) that option A is the
best we can do. B doesn't work because it depends on knowing or influencing how
the infoset was constructed, and in our processing model we don't have access to
that information (though of course real products can attempt to do things this
way). Option C implies an incompatibility between DTD-based and schema-based
processing which many people felt would be just as troublesome as the other
incompatibilities mentioned.
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 17:10:37 UTC