- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:41:21 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3433 ------- Comment #6 from mike@saxonica.com 2006-08-24 17:41 ------- I was actioned to propose detailed textual changes to resolve this (action A-304-01, aka A-304-1). 1. [XPath/XQuery] In 3.5.1 Value Comparisons, change this paragraph: Next, if possible, the two operands are converted to their least common type by a combination of type promotion and subtype substitution. For example, if the operands are of type hatsize (derived from xs:integer) and shoesize (derived from xs:float), their least common type is xs:float. to read: Next, if there is no entry in the operator mapping table for the types of the two operands, then the operands are converted (if possible) to the least common type for which there is such an entry. For example, (a) if the operands are of type hatsize (derived from xs:integer) and shoesize (derived from xs:float), their least common type is xs:float; (b) if the operands are both of type xs:anyURI, the least common type that has a suitable entry is xs:string. 2. [XQuery] "order by" requires no change. The existing text is adequate: "The ordering is performed in the least common type that has a gt operator." 3. [XSLT] (sorting) requires no change. The existing text is adequate: "To ensure a total ordering, the same implementation of the lt operator must be used for all the comparisons: the one that is chosen is the one appropriate to the most specific type to which all the values can be converted by subtype substitution and/or type promotion". 4. [F+O] min()/max(). I believe that we previously agreed a change in this area to talk about converting all the values to their least common type. I'm not sure of the exact wording. We need to change it to say "the least common type that has a gt operator". Michael Kay
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2006 17:41:29 UTC