http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3624 ------- Comment #3 from per@bothner.com 2006-08-24 15:40 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Moreover, the resolution of bug #2460 appears to be correctly reflected in the > 8 June 2006 edition of the spec. So it does. My apologies. In my defense let me point out that http://www.w3.org/XML/Query/ lists the specification as Candidate Recommendation 3rd November 2005 and no news item lists the June edition(s). Perhaps that could be fixed? Should I resolve this bug, marking it as "fixed" or perhaps "invalid"?Received on Thursday, 24 August 2006 15:40:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:13 UTC