- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:12:02 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3576 ------- Comment #3 from simeon@us.ibm.com 2006-08-10 05:12 ------- That's a tricky case here I think. I admit my opinion is that the spec is unclear. My first intuition is that XPST0001 should takes precedence. I.e., checking whether the type 'test:unkonwnType' is in the context, should occur before type matching is applied. A corrolary of that is that I think bullet '1 ET is an unknown type' should actually never be used. Because of the way the spec is written now, I would assume that keeping both error codes in the test suite is the right thing to do as implementations may actually do either one of those. But I would recommend asking the working group to clarify this. sorry I can't give a more definite answer to this right now. Best, - Jerome
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 05:12:09 UTC