RE: [F&O] INF, -INF and NaN - literals?

> 
> This is actually a comment on the XPath grammar.
> These 3 literals need to be defined as numeric literals in 
> section 3.1.1.


With respect, Ashok, there are no such literals, and the F+O document
shouldn't be using them in examples. They need to be written as
xs:double("INF"), xs:double("-INF"), and xs:double("NaN").

Michael Kay

Received on Friday, 14 January 2005 09:33:31 UTC