Re: [F&O] INF, -INF and NaN - literals? from Colin Paul Adams on 2005-01-14 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from January 2005)

From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@colina.demon.co.uk>
Date: 14 Jan 2005 09:26:48 +0000
To: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m3is609x9j.fsf@colina.demon.co.uk>

>>>>> "AM" == Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> writes:

    AM> This is actually a comment on the XPath grammar.  These 3
    AM> literals need to be defined as numeric literals in section
    AM> 3.1.1.

But in that case, do they not conflict with a NameTest for unqualified
elements with the names INF and NaN? 
-- 
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire

Received on Friday, 14 January 2005 09:27:26 UTC