- From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 18:16:56 -0600
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Mike,
The W3C XML Query WG and the W3C XSL WG have considered your
comment. After discussion, the WGs jointly determined that retaining the
fn:unordered() function was preferable to the suggestion you made as part
of your comment. In addition, a proposal was accepted to adopt additional
syntax (unordered{...} and ordered{...}) that provides syntactic sugar for
use of the fn:unordered() function when needed on many "nested" expressions
in an XQuery. This additional syntax might help ease the concerns you
expressed about fn:unordered().
The Working Groups have marked your comment as "decided" without further
action.
Please let us know whether you are willing to accept this resolution.
Hope this helps,
Jim
========================================================================
Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL) Phone: +1.801.942.0144
Oracle Corporation Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com
1930 Viscounti Drive Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org
Sandy, UT 84093-1063 Personal email: jim at melton dot name
USA Fax : +1.801.942.3345
========================================================================
= Facts are facts. However, any opinions expressed are the opinions =
= only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody =
= else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. =
========================================================================
Received on Friday, 7 May 2004 20:26:59 UTC