- From: <scott_boag@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:58:57 -0500
- To: "Willink, Ed" <Ed.Willink@thalesgroup.com>
- Cc: "'public-qt-comments@w3.org'" <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Ed, thanks for your last call comment. It will be processed by the working group. You make an interesting and valuable point that function names in the BNF need some sort of annotion spelling out the relation with reserved function names. There may be some technical problems with the solution you suggest, but I'll see what can be done. -scott public-qt-comments-request@w3.org wrote on 01/27/2004 06:48:02 AM: > > Hi > > Section A.1.1 and A.2.1 provide helpful grammar notes that are clearly > visible in the preceding BNF. > > Section A.3 provides equally significant clarification that does not. > For no very obvious reason gratuitous ElementName and AttributeName > aliases for QName are provided, yet there is no FunctionName to which the > A.3 text should be annotated. > > Therefore please replace QName by FunctionName in FunctionCall and > add e.g. > > FunctionName ::= QName /* A.3 reserved names */ > > Regards > > Ed Willink > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > E.D.Willink, Email: mailto:EdWillink@iee.org > Thales Research and Technology (UK) Ltd, Tel: +44 118 923 8278 (direct) > Worton Drive, or +44 118 986 8601 (ext 8278) > Worton Grange Business Park, Fax: +44 118 923 8399 > Reading, RG2 0SB > ENGLAND http://www.computing.surrey.ac.uk/personal/pg/E.Willink > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2004 09:59:14 UTC