- From: Jonathan Robie <jwrobie@mindspring.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:59:03 -0500
- To: "Biron,Paul V" <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org, W3C XML Schema WG <w3c-xml-schema-wg@w3.org>
Biron,Paul V wrote: > We agree that there are 2 kinds of types...but to make that clear, > shouldn't the definition read: > > Each type definition is identified either by a Qname > (for a *named type*) or by an implementation-dependent > type identifier (for an *anonymous type*)... > I am looking at this document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xpath20-20031112 Here is the definition I see: Each named type definition is identified either by a QName (for a named type) or by an implementation-dependent type identifier (for an anonymous type). I don't see the difference between what is there and what you suggest. Can you help me understand this? Jonathan
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 19:01:37 UTC