Re: [XPath 2.0] XSCH-XPATH-001

Biron,Paul V wrote:

> We agree that there are 2 kinds of types...but to make that clear, 
> shouldn't the definition read:
>
>         Each type definition is identified either by a Qname
>         (for a *named type*) or by an   implementation-dependent
>         type identifier (for an *anonymous type*)...
>
I am looking at this document:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xpath20-20031112

Here is the definition I see:

Each named type definition is identified either by a QName (for a
named type) or by an implementation-dependent type identifier (for an
anonymous type).

I don't see the difference between what is there and what you suggest. 
Can you help me understand this?

Jonathan

Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 19:01:37 UTC