- From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:12:07 -0000
- To: <jwrobie@mindspring.com>, "'Biron,Paul V'" <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>, "'W3C XML Schema WG'" <w3c-xml-schema-wg@w3.org>
> Here is the definition I see: > > Each named type definition is identified either by a QName > (for a named type) or by an implementation-dependent type > identifier (for an anonymous type). > > I don't see the difference between what is there and what you > suggest. > Can you help me understand this? > Paul is right. The above sentence uses "named type" twice with different meanings. We definitely need to sort this out. Michael Kay
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2004 09:11:25 UTC