- From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:37:07 -0000
- To: "'Elliotte Harold'" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, "'Michael Kay'" <mike@saxonica.com>
- Cc: "'Rich Salz'" <rsalz@datapower.com>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > Elliotte Harold > Sent: 16 December 2004 15:51 > To: Michael Kay > Cc: 'Rich Salz'; xml-dev@lists.xml.org; public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: [XQuery] Re: [xml-dev] draft-rsalz-qname-urn > > > Michael Kay wrote: > > > The XQuery specification, incidentally, defines a mapping > of error QNames to > > error URIs. It's different from this one, of course. > > The error URIs in the XQuery spec look like this: > > http://www.w3.org/2004/10/xqt-errors#XPST0017 > I agree with most of your concerns about the details of the proposed > qname URN scheme (IRIs vs. URIs, percent encoding, etc.) but at a > fundamental level I think the proposed scheme is better than > what XQuery is proposing. No "but" needed, we agree on that point too! Michael Kay I would suggest that XQuery adopt the new qname > URN scheme > rather than using http URIs to identify error codes. In fact, I'll cc > this to the XQuery working group to register it as a formal comment. > > -- > Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu > XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! > http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ > ref=nosim > >
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2004 16:37:43 UTC