- From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@colina.demon.co.uk>
- Date: 16 Dec 2004 16:33:14 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
I find the text in section 16.1 concerning the processing of fragment ids somewhat perplexing, especially the text for error XT1160. Since the commonest media types text/xml and application/xml do not define any rules for interpreting fragment-ids, then in most cases the processor must either report an error or recover by ignoring the fragment-id. This, I think, will be contrary to user expectations - the common expectation is that the fragment-id should be interpreted as an ID value. I think that perhaps there should be special mention of these media types, and specify that the rules of the XPointer framework should be considered as applicable to these media types -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2004 16:34:08 UTC