- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:44:55 -0700
- To: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: "Stephen Buxton" <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>
This was discussed at the WG meeting on 9/16/2003 and it was decided that this function was not useful enough to warrant adding another signature for it. This also covers a comment from Oracle on 6/30/2002 with title ORA-FO-LANG_ANYNODE. All the best, Ashok > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Rys > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 1:06 AM > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: MS-FO-LC1-084: fn:lang() function signature > > > Class: Editorial/Technical > > Section 14.1.5 fn:lang: Why only have one signature form? Also provide > signature with explicit node. > > NOTE: Same comment was made by Oracle. >
Received on Monday, 22 September 2003 14:44:59 UTC