- From: Oliver Becker <obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 16:13:52 +0200 (MEST)
- To: jim.melton@acm.org
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> We (perhaps obviously) did not expect that readers would be confused by the > current wording, saying that doc() replaced document() in the *joint* XPath > 2.0 and XQuery 1.0 F&O spec, while the doc() function Now it's me who is confused. You mean the document() function here, correct? > that is not going to > be available in XQuery will be published in the XSLT 2.0 spec, where it > will be available. Cheers, Oliver /-------------------------------------------------------------------\ | ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker | | --+-- E-Mail: obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de | | op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker | \-------------------------------------------------------------------/
Received on Friday, 16 May 2003 10:13:57 UTC