- From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 16:09:24 -0400
- To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
At 03:41 PM 6/5/2003 -0400, John Cowan wrote: > > At any rate, the current mappings do not support *any* W3C XML-Schema > > semantics in the Infoset-only mapping. I do think this is a slippery > slope, > > and I wouldn't support it. In effect, both you and Elliotte are asking > that > > we support the syntax of XML 1.x, but change the semantics by adding some > > pieces that each of you like. > >That's pretty much what Namespaces does, too: certain attributes get magic >values that effect the understandings about other attributes and elements. Yes - but Namespaces is part of XML, not something interposed between XML and the query language. Jonathan
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 16:09:32 UTC