Re: XPath Data Model proposal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> was heard to say:
| Jonathan Robie scripsit:
|
|> If I understand Norm correctly, Elliotte Rusty Harold was asking for that, 
|> but Norm wasn't. Norm, was that something that you support?
|
| See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jun/0029.html .

Ghaack! I said exactly the opposite of what I meant. Or read what John
said in exactly the opposite sense, or something.

That's *not* what I meant. I meant that xsi:nil should be recognized only
from the PSVI property, not from the literal attribute value.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | DNA neither cares nor knows. DNA just is. And
XML Standards Architect | we dance to its music.--Richard Dawkins
Web Tech. and Standards |
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+4LF7OyltUcwYWjsRAqYcAJ45HrOpCeTMyeEmHH56J9BF6cjJ2QCgqsQ+
0G8dh/1c1NmMXM0R3w6RzQ8=
=lnmf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 6 June 2003 11:22:32 UTC