- From: Oliver Becker <obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:19:46 +0200 (MEST)
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Hello, would you please explain the reason for having recoverable errors? (Yes, they are already in XSLT 1.0, but nevertheless ...) If it is implementation-dependent whether such a recoverable error will be reported or not, don't you think that this leads to non-portable stylesheets? The XSLT developer might not be aware of the recovering action when developing the stylesheet. So, theoretically, an XSLT engine built into a web browser could report the error (and nothing else), while the developer's engine seems to work fine. Both are standard compliant. This kind of choice for the behaviour of an XSLT implementation is a bad idea in my mind. It would be better to require that all implementations must produce the same defined result on a given input. Best regards, Oliver Becker /-------------------------------------------------------------------\ | ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker | | --+-- E-Mail: obecker@informatik.hu-berlin.de | | op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker | \-------------------------------------------------------------------/
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2003 07:19:48 UTC