- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:30:07 -0800
- To: "Per Bothner" <per@bothner.com>, "Kay, Michael" <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
From an XQuery point of view, I agree with Per. There is also the question of closure for many systems. If the XML Data model producer recognizes a text node as input and is a normal XML fragment parser, I find it not acceptable to standardize the more complex requirement that your data model producer needs to be able to understand specialized markup. Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Per Bothner > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:05 AM > To: Kay, Michael > Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: [XQuery] SAG-XQ-005 Serializing Arbitrary Sequences > > > Kay, Michael wrote: > > > > I think there is a need for "human-readable" serialization, > > > which does not necessarily have to be reversible. > > > > I agree that products will want to produce such output, but does it have > > to be standardized? If it's only for humans to read, and not for > > software to read, why do we need to specify its format? > > Because someone might want to (say) generate a report or a file > as a text (non-html) file, and it is useful to have a standard for this. > > E.g. given some numbers, I might want to produce a "report" like: > > The max is 99 and the min is 5. > > A user expect to be able to write: > > "The max is ",max($vals)," and the min is ",min($vals),"." > > or: > > concat("The max is ",max($vals)," and the min is ",min($vals),".") > > depending on what the standard specifies wrt to whitespace. But it is > useful for the standard to specify a specific result so I know what > output to expect for a given program. > > > And if it's for humans to read, wouldn't one want to produce something > > richer than a string of ASCII characters? > > True most of the time. But sometimes one wants to be able to generate > simple non-HTML output. I think this is a useful feature, and I think > people will expect portable results. > > Perhaps the "text output model" sufficies for these applications - but > unfortunately there appears to be no standard way to set serialization > parameters in an XQuery program, like you can for XSLT. Also, it seems > less intuitive to have to write: > > <result>The max is {max($vals)} and the min is {min($vals)}.</result> > > only to want the <result></result> to disappear. > -- > --Per Bothner > per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2003 12:31:14 UTC