- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:28:24 +0900
- To: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
Hi Ville, I'm not sure if you have had time to follow the recent discussions on this list about the work on a unified tool/framework/format for conformance and other observations, which Damien and Jean-Gui have been making rapid progress on. One of the applications of that system is to be able to merge observations about one resource, e.g different types of validation, plus link checking. In order to make the link checker an observer for that system, I've been looking at modifying its code to add the necessary extra output... As you know, the current link checker code isn't extremely flexible in this regard, and I thought, instead of adding more if- cases and more printf, whether we could give actual templates a go. I can see two possible issues with that: - configuring the template path (been there, done that... but the link checker generally doesn't need a conf file, and it would be better to remain that way, wouldn't it?) - making templates sufficiently atomic to still allow progressive output as checking is taking place I was wondering if you had any thought on the matter? Do you think templates would be a good idea, or not adapted to the link checker at current? -- olivier
Received on Friday, 30 June 2006 02:28:33 UTC