- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:43:43 +0100
- To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: public-qa-dev@w3.org
* olivier Thereaux wrote: >Then there is the issue of "fussy parsing", for which which I am not >certain we have reached a decision. But if we decide either to trash >the idea altogether or to make it non-default, I do not think it should >be very long to make the changes. http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/ resolved everything in this regard, as far as I am concerned. Long before this "fussy" thingy has been added to the W3C MarkUp Validator, actually. -wfully-tagged is not of any use for the community as long as it complains about all <table> elements without a <tbody> inside. -wmin-tag should certainly be the default and rewrite its errors to warnings, see the WDG Validator. >Given all of the above, I would like to go around the table for your >opinion on pushing the 0.6.5beta2 (as it is in its current state) >forward, even to a release state: I do not care much what happens on a port != 80, but I would like to point out that I consider the beta highlighting behavior unusable, see <http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=http://msdn.microsoft.com> vs. <http://validator.w3.org:80/check?uri=http://msdn.microsoft.com>.
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2004 02:48:02 UTC