- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:19:12 +0900
- To: public-qa-dev@w3.org
- Message-Id: <9EC2B50E-7C89-11D8-B1A3-000393A63FC8@w3.org>
I have browsed our bugzilla today, trying to have a better picture at which bugs we have associated with which target, and what we'd need to do to move forward with check for at least a 0.6.5beta2. As far as I can tell, except for bugs 297[1] and 300[2], there is no open/new bug for this target, and most remaining bugs (quite a few, I agree) have been pushed to 0.7.0. [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=297 [2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=300 Of these two, only 297 (config option to integrate better with system catalog) may be hard to implement. Then there is the issue of "fussy parsing", for which which I am not certain we have reached a decision. But if we decide either to trash the idea altogether or to make it non-default, I do not think it should be very long to make the changes. Given all of the above, I would like to go around the table for your opinion on pushing the 0.6.5beta2 (as it is in its current state) forward, even to a release state: PRO: long awaited changes. Provided we take care of bug#297 and roll out the current CVS version, 0.6.5 will reasonably be, if not the_perfect_release, the usable, installable release, which is something our current production version is lacking... CON: that would be postponing to some future version many of the changes requested during the beta1. Timeline: I have to help Ville roll out checklink first, but once this is done, I can probably focus on check. That means we could target a date around our next monthly meeting. Could everyone give their view on the topic? Thanks. -- olivier
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 02:04:02 UTC