Re: [check] open bug roundup

On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Olivier Thereaux wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > +1.  Then there's the issue how to mark docs that produce
> > errors/warnings in fussy mode.
> Precisely, that's where the complication comes from.

"Parsing [url] in [****] mode"
"Result: [pass|fail] (approx. n messages)"
IF mode has extra warnings:
	"Note: parsing in [mode] mode generates additional warnings
	over and above technical validation errors."

> In other words, the options we have at this point are, I believe:
> - make fussy mode optional and be happy with the fact tat it marks
>   documents as invalid. (+ s/lax/normal/ in the fussy mode note)
> - remove fussy mode altogether (comment it out)

If we term it pass/fail, we avoid that problem by not applying the
word valid or invalid to a document.  Problem solved.

But I still think we need a sensible warnings mode.
onsgmls -wmin-tag (as used in Valet Web mode and htmlhelp "warnings")
is IMNSHO the most useful for most of our users (except Jukka).

Nick Kew

Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2004 06:44:15 UTC