- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:39:22 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: public-qa-dev@w3.org
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Olivier Thereaux wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > +1. Then there's the issue how to mark docs that produce > > errors/warnings in fussy mode. > > Precisely, that's where the complication comes from. "Parsing [url] in [****] mode" "Result: [pass|fail] (approx. n messages)" IF mode has extra warnings: "Note: parsing in [mode] mode generates additional warnings over and above technical validation errors." > In other words, the options we have at this point are, I believe: > - make fussy mode optional and be happy with the fact tat it marks > documents as invalid. (+ s/lax/normal/ in the fussy mode note) > - remove fussy mode altogether (comment it out) If we term it pass/fail, we avoid that problem by not applying the word valid or invalid to a document. Problem solved. But I still think we need a sensible warnings mode. onsgmls -wmin-tag (as used in Valet Web mode and htmlhelp "warnings") is IMNSHO the most useful for most of our users (except Jukka). -- Nick Kew
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2004 06:44:15 UTC