Re: Draft EPUB Survey: Feedback requested

I think it should be more explicit in the intro that this survey will influence the whole of the Publishing@W3C activity. At the moment, the text says:

"We hope this information will provide valuable input to the W3C’s EPUB 3 Community Group and the Publishing Business Group, as well as all of us who work with EPUB.”

maybe something like:

“We hope that this information will provide valuable input to the future work on EPUB and related formats within the framework of the Publishing@W3C activity, in particular to the W3C’s EPUB 3 Community Group and the Publishing Business Group, as well as all of us who work with EPUB.”


Also: I do not know the exact possibilities of survey monkey, but is it possible to add hyperlinks to the various groups? I am not sure all readers will have a clear idea on what these groups and activities are…

Thanks

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
On 5 Feb 2020, 23:20 +0100, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>, wrote:
> Hi PubSteerCoFolks!
>
> We have a draft of the survey ready in SurveyMonkey. You can actually take the survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PT2MMJV
>
> I've been working on the survey organization, which is somewhat constrained by what SurveyMonkey allows.
>
> Right now my major concern is about Sections 5 for Educators, and Section 6 for Governmental and Corporate Publications. Many of the questions in these sections may come across as proselytizing. I wonder if we can integrate these sections into the rest of the survey, while also reducing the number of questions (we have 85 right now). We are not focusing on other specific sectors of the industry in the same way, and I have also worked on language to make most of the questions less book-specific (hi Bill!) and perhaps a tiny bit less trade-specific.
>
> Please provide feedback by email. You can take the survey to see how it feels, but don't put your thoughtful answers in just yet :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave