Re: Draft EPUB Survey: Feedback requested

Hi Ivan,

I have updated the introductory text, and created links to P@W3C, the CG,
and the BG.

Thanks,

Dave

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 4:46 AM Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> I think it should be more explicit in the intro that this survey will
> influence the whole of the Publishing@W3C activity. At the moment, the
> text says:
>
> "We hope this information will provide valuable input to the W3C’s EPUB 3
> Community Group and the Publishing Business Group, as well as all of us who
> work with EPUB.”
>
> maybe something like:
>
> “We hope that this information will provide valuable input to the future
> work on EPUB and related formats within the framework of the Publishing@W3C
> activity, in particular to the W3C’s EPUB 3 Community Group and the
> Publishing Business Group, as well as all of us who work with EPUB.”
>
>
> Also: I do not know the exact possibilities of survey monkey, but is it
> possible to add hyperlinks to the various groups? I am not sure all readers
> will have a clear idea on what these groups and activities are…
>
> Thanks
>
> Ivan
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
> On 5 Feb 2020, 23:20 +0100, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>, wrote:
>
> Hi PubSteerCoFolks!
>
> We have a draft of the survey ready in SurveyMonkey. You can actually take
> the survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PT2MMJV
>
> I've been working on the survey organization, which is somewhat
> constrained by what SurveyMonkey allows.
>
> Right now my major concern is about Sections 5 for Educators, and Section
> 6 for Governmental and Corporate Publications. Many of the questions in
> these sections may come across as proselytizing. I wonder if we can
> integrate these sections into the rest of the survey, while also reducing
> the number of questions (we have 85 right now). We are not focusing on
> other specific sectors of the industry in the same way, and I have also
> worked on language to make most of the questions less book-specific (hi
> Bill!) and perhaps a tiny bit less trade-specific.
>
> Please provide feedback by email. You can take the survey to see how it
> feels, but don't put your thoughtful answers in just yet :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
>
>